[2. Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a briefing session to discuss all items scheduled on tonight’s agenda. No action will be taken. Each item will be considered during the Regular Session which immediately follows the Joint Public Hearings. ]

OKAY. SO THE FIRST ITEM WAS A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BASEBALL ON 1900 SOUTH MAIN.

THEIR REQUEST WAS TO FINISH OUT APPROXIMATELY 25,000 SQUARE FEET OF AN EXISTING WAREHOUSE BUILDING IN THE EXISTING STACY'S FURNITURE BUILDING.

FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING AND FINISHING OUT A PRO SHOP, OFFICE, BATHROOMS, AN INDOOR BATTING AND KITCHEN AREA.

THEY HAVE, HOWEVER, REQUESTED TO WITHDRAW THIS CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST.

I'M NOT LOOKING FOR RECONCILIATION AT THIS TIME.

THE SECOND REQUEST BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING IS FOR THE EXISTING WAL MART RETAIL STORE AT 1601 WEST STATE HIGHWAY 114 FOR ANY ZONED COMMUNITY, COMMERCIAL OR CC.

WHAT THEY ARE PROPOSING TO DO IS TO CREATE AN OUTSIDE STORAGE AREA ALONG THE SOUTHERN ELEVATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4900 SQUARE FEET. IT'S ON THE SOUTHERN ELEVATION AND ADJACENT ABOUT 154 FEET THAT NORTH IS FACING UP, I THINK NORTH.

THANK YOU. IT'S ABOUT 154 FEET FROM THE NEAREST PROPERTY TO THE WEST, WHICH IS ZONED LI-1 AND THIS AREA IS SPECIFICALLY SO THAT THEY COULD PLACE PERMANENTLY TWO STORAGE CONTAINERS. WHAT THEY HOPE TO DO IS USE THIS TO STORE BOTH LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT AND REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT, BECAUSE THIS WILL BE A CENTRAL LOCATION FOR THEM TO MAINTAIN THIS WALMART STORE AND OTHER WAL MART STORES IN THE REGION.

SO IT'S AN OUTSIDE STORAGE AREA FOR TWO STORAGE CONTAINERS, EIGHT BY 40 BY EIGHT.

AND THEN THEY'LL ALSO HAVE ROOM FOR TWO TRUCKS AND TWO LANDSCAPE TRAILERS.

SO THEY WILL NOW BE DOING THEIR OWN MAINTENANCE ON THEIR OWN FACILITIES, AND THIS WILL BE THE LOCATION THAT THEY HAVE TO STORE THAT EQUIPMENT AT.

HOW TALL ARE THE TRUCKS? [INAUDIBLE] WANT TO KNOW SPECIFICALLY HOW TALL THE TRUCKS ARE.

I DON'T. BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE THE TRUCKS STORED THERE IN SPACE.

TRACTOR TRAILERS, RIGHT? YES. THEY GAVE US THE 30, 30 FOOT, 30 FEET.

IT'S A FIRE TRUCK.

SO THAT'S AN F-150.

OH, THERE IS.

I MISSPOKE IF THERE IS AN ELEVATION OF THE TROPHY.

I WANT TO KNOW THE ICE BOX THAT'S BEEN THERE AND IF I CAN.

I THOUGHT MY SKILL WITH WHAT YOU HAVE SEEN FROM THAT.

WELL, THAT'S MY POINT.

. NO. HELPS HIMSELF BACK THERE ALREADY WHERE THEY LIVE UP AND LOVE IT.

BUT WHAT'S IT GOING TO BE? WELL, IT'S A LOT MORE THAN JUST WE MAKE EVERYBODY ELSE MAKE EVERYBODY ELSE DO IT.

IT'S JUST ME. NO MATTER WHAT BORDERING IT, THOUGH, WHAT'S RIGHT UP AGAINST IT.

AND IT'S LIGHT INDUSTRIAL RIGHT NEXT DOOR, THE BACKSIDE OF IT.

AND THEY HAVE TRACTOR TRAILERS IN AND OUT ALL THE TIME.

SO MAYBE THE BACK OF THE BUILDING.

ANY QUESTIONS ? BUT NO OTHER QUESTIONS, RIGHT?

[1. Receive a report, hold a discussion, and provide staff direction regarding amendment to the definition for condominiums and creation of a definition for rowhouses. ]

OUR NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS TO RECEIVE, REPORT AND PROVIDE STAFF DIRECTION REGARDING A POTENTIAL TEXT AMENDMENT IN RELATION TO THE DEFINITION FOR CONDOMINIUMS AND ROWHOUSES. IF YOU RECALL LAST MAY, WE BROUGHT BEFORE YOU DURING THE WORKSHOP, NOT ALL OF YOU WERE PRESIDENT, PRESENT.

MY GOODNESS, YOU GUYS.

BUT AT THAT TIME, PRIOR TO THAT, WE HAD HAD A REQUEST RECENTLY FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A BROWNSTONE PROJECT IN OUR DALLAS ROAD CORRIDOR.

AND AT THAT TIME THERE WAS SOME QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS THAT THE TERM CONDOMINIUM VERSUS TOWNHOME THAT WAS BEING USED FOR THAT PROJECT WERE

[00:05:10]

BEING USED INTERCHANGEABLY AND IT WASN'T VERY CLEAR WHAT THE DIFFERENCE WAS.

AND IN ACTUALITY, THAT WAS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT THAT WAS BOUGHT AND SOLD AS IF IT WERE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT AND HAD COMMON ELEMENTS TO THE PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE IN A CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION AND THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ASSOCIATION AND ALL THE OWNERS PAYING INTO IT.

SO WE BROUGHT THAT TO YOU ON MAY 17, 2022.

SO SINCE THAT TIME, WE'VE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

THESE DEFINITIONS THAT WE ALREADY HAVE CURRENTLY SECTION 12 OF OUR ZONING ORDINANCE DEFINES CONDOMINIUMS AS SEPARATE OWNERSHIP OF SINGLE UNITS OR APARTMENTS IN A MULTIPLE UNIT STRUCTURE WITH COMMON ELEMENTS AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 1301, A TEXAS REVISED CIVIL STATUTES ANNOTATED.

AND WHAT WE DID IN MAY IS WE PROVIDE IT TO YOU WITHIN YOUR AGENDA MEMO SOME DEFINITIONS FROM SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES SO YOU COULD SEE WHAT ELSE WAS OUT THERE.

AND THE DATA THAT WAS PREDOMINANTLY DEFINED AS A FORM OF MULTIFAMILY BY SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES.

AND IT CLEARLY STATED THAT THE UNITS WHERE ONE OR MORE COMMON LOTS, MAYBE ON ONE OR MORE LOTS.

HOWEVER, THE FEEDBACK THAT WE RECEIVED FROM THE COMMISSION AT THAT TIME WAS THAT YOU GUYS REALLY WANTED TO SEE IT AS A FORM OF SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND TO BE CONSIDERED FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND THAT IT BE SOLD FEE SIMPLE.

SO WE ALSO WERE ASKED TO LOOK AT ROW HOUSES AND DISTINGUISH THOSE FROM TOWNHOMES AND TO COME UP WITH A DEFINITION FOR THOSE.

BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH IN THE SECTION THAT DOES DEALS WITH THE TRANSIT DISTRICT OVERLAY, WE HAVE SEVERAL HOUSE, WE DON'T CURRENTLY HAVE A DEFINITION OF ROW HOUSE WITHIN SECTION 12.

SO WE'VE ATTEMPTED TO DO THAT.

AND IF YOU LOOK IN YOUR BACKUP MATERIALS, WE HAVE A SHEET THAT HAS A STRIKETHROUGH UNDERLINED FORMAT WITH RED AND BLUE INK.

AND SO THAT PICTURE, THOUGH, WOULD NOT FIT OUR DEFINITION OF ROW HOUSES.

THESE ARE JUST PICTURES WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE.

SO RIGHT NOW I JUST THINK IS IT REALLY THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS ROW HOUSE OR MORE AND THE FACADES ARE IDENTICAL VERSUS A TOWNHOME WHERE THEY AREN'T NECESSARILY BUT COULD BE RIGHT NOW.

THAT IS HOW WE HAVE DRAFTED THE DEFINITION AND WE'RE LOOKING FOR YOUR IMPACT, YOUR INPUT.

WHAT WE WERE THINKING WAS THAT WITH ROW HOUSE IT WOULD BE A VERY SIMILAR FACADE ALONG THE SAME BUILDING LINE.

YOU REALLY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO TELL ANY UNIT DIFFERENCES AND IT WOULD BE ONE COMMON BUILDING, WHEREAS A TOWNHOME WOULD TYPICALLY SEE THOSE AS A DEVELOPMENT AND THEY'RE KIND OF STAGGERED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG DIFFERENT FIRE LINES OR RIGHTS OF WAY.

IT CAN BE IN DIFFERENT UNIT CONFIGURATIONS.

BUT SO IN OUR IN OUR RESEARCH, WE DIDN'T SEE A LOT OF DIFFERENTIATION.

SO WE'RE ASKING FOR YOU GUYS IF YOU HAVE, WHY DOES THERE NEED TO BE I MEAN, IF WE ASKED FOR THAT, WHY DID WE ASK YOU FOR THAT? YEAH, WHY DOES THERE NEED TO BE A DIFFERENCE? AND I DON'T REMEMBER EVEN TALKING ABOUT THE WORD ROWHOUSE.

WELL, MY QUESTION IS, THE DEVELOPERS COME TO YOU AND SAY, I WANT TO BUILD A ROWHOUSES? I GUESS I NEVER HEARD THAT.

PLEASE UNDERSTAND, WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT THE RAIL DISTRICT A NUMBER OF TIMES IN THOSE MEETINGS WITH THE COUNCIL AND STUFF, WE DISCUSSED ROWHOUSES AS A POSSIBILITY OVER ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE ROAD, BUT WE DON'T HAVE A ROWHOUSE TYPE ORDINANCE.

AND SO I THINK THAT'S WHAT PROBABLY PROMPTED SOME OF THIS.

IF WE WANT TO GO THAT WAY AND HAVE SOME ESTABLISHMENT FOR THAT.

BUT THAT'S THE ONLY THING BECAUSE THEY TALKED ABOUT SOME ACCEPTABLE TYPE OF THINGS WE MIGHT LOOK AT.

AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE TERMS THAT CAME UP DURING THOSE MEETINGS.

I LIKE THIS DOCUMENT.

IT'S CLEAR, CLEAN.

WELL, GOOD. READS EASY.

BUT LET'S CAN WE TALK ABOUT EACH ONE OF THESE SEPARATELY? YES, THAT WAS APARTMENT AND APARTMENT HOUSE.

IT'S NOT REALLY A STANDALONE USE WITHIN ANY OF THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS.

THE ONLY OTHER TIME WE SEE IT REALLY MENTIONED IS WITHIN THE PARKING REGULATIONS, WHICH WE ARE ALSO PROPOSING TO AMEND.

WITH THAT, UNDER THE DEFINITION OF CONDOMINIUM, WE'RE PROPOSING TO COMPLETELY REMOVE THE CURRENT DEFINITION AND GO WITH SOMETHING THAT WAS MORE SIMILAR TO WHAT SOUTH LAKE HAS, WHERE IT'S A DWELLING UNIT WITHIN DWELLING UNITS CONVEYED BY FEE SIMPLE TITLE WITH UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENTS.

AND THEN IT GIVES EXAMPLES OF WHAT THOSE COMMON ELEMENTS MIGHT BE, INCLUDING PARKING SPACES, LAND, ELEVATOR, STAIRS, HALLWAYS.

[00:10:08]

IT COULD BE RECREATIONAL FEATURES OR EQUIPMENT.

DO YOU HAVE ANY? NO MINIMUM OR MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS FOR A CONDOMINIUM THEN.

IS THAT CORRECT? NOT CURRENTLY.

OKAY. SO. SO THAT'S SOMETHING WE'LL HAVE A DISCUSSION ON BECAUSE EVERYTHING ELSE HAS GOT SOME BASIS.

NUMBER OF PLATS PER ACRE, FOR EXAMPLE.

I THINK THAT DEFINITION IS GOOD WITH THE [INAUDIBLE].

IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S CLOSE TO.

SO LET ME BE SURE.

I'LL BE SURE. I'M FOLLOWING SOME THINGS HERE.

I KNOW UNDER THIS UNDER THIS DEFINITION TITLE, THESE ARE DEFINITIONS FOR VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL USES. TYPES OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS? YES, SIR. SO EXPLAIN TO ME ABOUT MY APARTMENTS.

GO AWAY. WE'RE USING THE TERM MULTIFAMILY FOR MULTIFAMILY FOR LEASE PRODUCT IN APARTMENT.

IT DIDN'T IT WASN'T USED ANYWHERE ELSE AS A STANDALONE USE.

I DON'T SEE MULTIFAMILY.

JUST BELOW FOURPLEX.

YEAH, WELL, YEAH, YEAH.

SEE, YOU GOT MULTIFAMILY HERE, WHICH IS WHAT THE ZONING IS CALLED NOW ANYWAY.

AND THEN WE WOULD HAVE, WE WOULD EACH INDIVIDUAL MULTIFAMILY UNIT FOR LEASE, WE WOULD JUST REFER TO THAT AS A UNIT RATHER THAN AN APARTMENT.

WELL I'M HAPPY TO SEE APARTMENT TO GOING AND MULTIFAMILY TAKE ITS PLACE ESSENTIALLY RIGHT.

SAME THING WRONG WITH THAT.

I MEAN IT'S BE A LITTLE MORE.

YES. BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT MULTIFAMILY HAS THE SAME ALL THE SAME INFO THAT THE APARTMENT HAS, LIKE APARTMENT HOUSE, WHICH TALKS ABOUT BEING RENTED, LEASING OR NONE OF THAT'S IN THE MULTIFAMILY DWELLING.

I'M MISSING SOMETHING.

WELL, THERE'S NOT ENOUGH.

YEAH, WHAT I'M SAYING, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A LOT MORE DESCRIPTION IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF MULTIFAMILY AND THE THINGS THAT ARE PART OF THAT DEVELOPMENT THAT THERE'S NOT ANYTHING HERE WITH THAT. SO EXPAND ON THE DEFINITION.

YEAH, WE NEED TO EXPAND.

THE MULTIFAMILY SEEMS FINE, BUT JUST MAYBE SOME OF THIS OTHER INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED.

OF COURSE WE CAN DO THAT.

DEFINITELY DESIGNED, BUILT AND THEN LEASED.

AND I GUESS IT'S THREE OR MORE UNITS WHICH JUST OCCUPIES THE HOME RESIDENCE.

THREE OR MORE FAMILIES MAY LIMIT IT TO THREE OR NOT.

JUST NEED SOME COLLECTION OF FLOOR PLANS.

WELL, YEAH, IT COULD BE. WE ALSO CURRENTLY HAVE THE DUPLEX TRIPLEX AND FOURPLEX, SO IT MAY NEED TO BE FIVE UNITS.

OKAY. SO MAYBE THAT WOULD BE BETTER.

UP TO FIVE OR MORE.

AND AND ALSO, IN THE END, THOSE ALSO TALK ABOUT THE NUMBER OF UNITS PER ACRE IN THOSE DEFINITIONS, TOO. CURRENTLY, I MEAN, EVERYTHING WE EVERYTHING WE HAD IN A IN A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DID HAVE SOME TIED TO HOW MANY UNITS PER ACRE THEY COULD BE.

I DON'T THINK WE WANT TO GET AWAY FROM THAT.

AND AFTER ABOUT THOSE BATTLES.

ALL RIGHT. YOU CAN DEFINITELY INCLUDE THAT LANGUAGE.

IS IT ALREADY LIKE IN ORDINANCE FORM OR WHERE IS THAT? THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. IT MIGHT BE WORTH THINKING ABOUT TYING THE DEFINITION OF THIS ARTICLE 13 01A THAT'S BEEN OBSOLETE SINCE LIKE 1993 OR 1995 OR SOMETHING, BUT THERE COULD BE SOME VALUE IN SAYING IT'S DEFINITION THAT'S IN THE TEXAS CONDOMINIUM ACT.

SOMETHING YOU MIGHT WANT TO ASK THE CITY ATTORNEY THAT.

DO WE WANT TO GLOM ONTO ALL THE PRECEDENT THAT'S OUT THERE? THIS IS WHAT A CONDOMINIUM IS AND THIS IS ALL THESE CASES THAT SAY WHAT APPLIES TO A [INAUDIBLE] AND WHAT DOESN'T.

WHAT DO WE WANT? OUR OWN DEFINITION.

AND IT WAS TIED TO THE STATUTE FOR A REASON.

WE WANT TO TIE IT TO THE STATUTE, WHICH IS THE COMMON ELEMENTS, DEFINITELY, WHICH IS WHAT'S TYING THOSE COMMON ELEMENTS TO I DON'T WANT TO REMEMBER, BUT I DON'T HAVE IT HERE. BUT THE MULTIFAMILY, DOES IT HAVE AN ACREAGE, A MINIMUM ACREAGE FOR ANY OF THOSE WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT ITSELF, THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, THE RMF? IT DOES, YES.

ALBERT, DO YOU HAVE A ZONING ORDINANCE? YES.

[00:15:13]

IT'S GOING TO BE. 12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.

AND WHAT DOES IT SAY ABOUT FOURPLEX AND FIVE AND THREE PLEX COMPLEX? TALK ABOUT ACREAGE FOR THOSE.

LET'S SEE. WE JUST.

YOU SAID A THREE PLEX ? TRIPLEX. THREE AND FOUR FAMILIES.

IT ACTUALLY GIVES A DENSITY OF TWIN DWELLING UNITS.

BREAK. IS THAT WHAT YOU ASK? YEAH. 10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND THAT'S THREE AND FOUR FAMILY DISTRICT.

WAS THERE ANOTHER ONE THAT YOU MENTIONED? THAT'S OKAY. OKAY.

AND SO WE NEED TO KNOW BASED ON WHAT WE'VE GOT HERE, BECAUSE THE R-12-5 AND ALL THOSE THINGS ALL HAVE A UNIT. BASICALLY THOSE ARE TRYING OF THOSE GROUPS ARE KIND OF BROKEN DOWN TO THE LOW DENSITY AND MEDIUM DENSITY.

SO WE NEED TO KIND OF GET A FEEL FOR WHAT THAT IS SO WE KNOW WHERE CONDOMINIUMS NEED TO GO.

SO A BREAKDOWN, THAT'S BECAUSE IF WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT GENERAL MASTER PLAN OF LOW DENSITY, MEDIUM DENSITY AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, WE'VE GOT TO HAVE SOMETHING FOR THE BASES THAT WERE THOSE.

ERICA MR. OLIVER, I READ AN OLD MULTIFAMILY.

THE RMF IS ACTUALLY 20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.

AND IN THE OLD RMF ONE WAS LIKE 12.

THAT WAS 12 UNITS PER ACRE.

THAT'S CORRECT. AND THE TWO WAS THE 20 UNITS PER ACRE.

THE CURRENT, YES, IS 20 UNIT PER ACRE.

PREVIOUS TO IT. WHEN WE BRING THIS BACK TO YOU, WE CAN DEFINITELY PROVIDE THAT IN A TABLE FORMAT.

YOU KNOW, JUST TO BE SURE, WE WERE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE'RE GOING TO LOOK.

THAT SO OCCURRED UNDER A CONDOMINIUM.

MINIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS TYPE.

POTENTIALLY TIE BACK TO THE CONDOMINIUM ACT ON THAT.

ALSO, I SHOULD KNOW OUR ORDINANCE IS BETTER, BUT DO WE EVER NEED A DEFINITION OF CONDOMINIUM THAT'S A NON RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM? I DON'T THINK WE HAVE THAT IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE RIGHT NOW FOR OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS. I DON'T THINK WE WANT TO DO IT BECAUSE WE WANT THIS TO END UP IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING CATEGORY.

SO IT WOULD JUST BE AN OFFICE, LIKE A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT IN THOSE CATEGORIES, I WOULD THINK.

OR WE CAN CALL THIS RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM WITH THAT IN THE RESIDENTIAL CATEGORY, RIGHT? WELL, THE DEFINITION SAYS A DWELLING UNIT.

AND IF SOMEONE IS PROPOSING AN OFFICE, SMALL OR LARGE, YOU WOULD HEAR NO PARKING ALL THE TIME TO USE OCCUPANTS OVER LEASE AND THE ROW THE ROW HOUSES.

I GUESS I'M ON THAT ONE.

JUST A QUICK COMMENT.

I GUESS I'M THE DEFINITION AND WE TALKED ABOUT THIS ONE, HOW THEY ALL LOOK ALIKE.

I'M NOT SURE WHY WE WANT TO BE NECESSARILY ALL LOOK ALIKE.

I UNDERSTAND THE SETBACKS SHOULD BE THE SAME IF IT'S A ROW HOUSE, BUT THEY CAN BE DIFFERENT COLOR BRICK AND THEY CAN BE DIFFERENT THINGS.

YEAH. YEAH. I DON'T THINK THEY HAVE TO.

I DON'T KNOW THAT THEY NEED TO BE IDENTICAL.

I THINK THEY CAN HAVE SOME LIKE ONE CAN HAVE A BAY WINDOW AND I THINK THE INTENT IS THE OVERALL LOOK.

YEAH, RIGHT. LIKE THE ARCHITECTURE.

WHEN YOU GO WITH A THEME MODERN VERSUS.

IT SAYS CONNECTED IN A CONTEMPORARY, I THINK.

BUT I DON'T THINK THERE'S A NEED THAT THEY ALL BE MIRROR IMAGES OF EACH OTHER DOWN TO THERE.

SO YOU HAVE IN THERE THE WORD WITHOUT VERY DIFFERENCES AND BESIDE I THINK IT JUST YOU COULD SAY MAYBE WITH WITH OR WITHOUT I MEAN OR LAID OUT.

IT DOESN'T MATTER IF IT'S RIGHT HERE.

IT SAYS WITHOUT VERY DIFFERENCES IN THE FLOOR PLAN OR FACADE OR ARTICULATION AND FROM ADJACENT DWELLINGS.

AND THAT'S WHAT WE DON'T WANT.

[00:20:12]

SPEAKERS].

SO DO NOT PROHIBIT VARIETY.

YEAH. THERE YOU GO. YEAH.

IS THERE ANY COMMENT ON DUPLEX EFFICIENCY UNIT OR FOURPLEX BUILDING? AND THEN ON MULTIFAMILY DWELLING.

BUT I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND EFFICIENCY UNIT BY ITSELF.

IT'S JUST A UNIT THAT CAN BE WITHIN A MULTIFAMILY DWELLING THAT DOESN'T HAVE A DIFFERENTIATION OF LIVING SPACE FROM LIKE A COMMON AREA, YOUR LIVING ROOM KITCHEN. YOU MAY HAVE MOST LIKELY HAVE A SEPARATE LITTLE ROOM FOR BATHROOM, BUT THAT WAS ALREADY THERE, RIGHT? RIGHT.

IN THE MULTIFAMILY ORDINANCE.

THERE COULD ONLY BE A LIMITED NUMBER OF THE EFFICIENCY UNIT.

SO THE BOARD CAN SAY THAT.

YEAH. SO IT WOULDN'T NECESSARILY NEED TO BE THE DEFINITION OF EFFICIENCY, BECAUSE THE POINT IS THE ORDINANCE SAYS THAT.

I MEAN, IT CAN BE IN THE DEFINITION.

MIGHT NEED TO BE. IT JUST GIVES THE UNIT SIZE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE UNIT SIZE.

IT DOESN'T SAY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTIFAMILY PROJECT THAT THERE CAN BE THERE'S A LIMITED NUMBER OF EFFICIENCY.

I DON'T SEE THAT.

I'LL KEEP LOOKING. I THOUGHT THERE WAS SOMETHING OFF MIC].

AND THEN I HEARD MULTIFAMILY DWELLING MORE DESCRIPTION POTENTIALLY FROM THE APARTMENT AND I'M CARRIES OVER SOME OF THE DEFINITIONS FROM THE APARTMENTS.

ANY FEEDBACK ON THE SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING ADDING THE EXAMPLES.

SEVEN. THERE IS A DEFICIENCY IN ONE BEDROOM THAT'S BETWEEN 600 SQUARE FEET AND 750 SQUARE FEET, NOT MORE THAN 15% OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS.

IT'S A PERCENTAGE.

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING.

WE JUST ADDED THAT IT'S ON ONE LOT.

AND THAT TOWNHOUSE DEFINITION, WE ADDED THAT IT WOULD BE CONVEYED BY THE TITLE AND THEN TRIPLEX AGAIN ON ONE LOT.

CAN YOU SKIP AHEAD TO THE LAST SLIDE? FOR THE LAST FIVE.

I HAVE ONE QUICK QUESTION.

SURE. THERE'S NOTHING IN HERE ABOUT BECAUSE OF HOW WE DESCRIBE THESE IS THEY HAVE A COMMON WALL, THEY'RE ATTACHED ABOUT ANY KIND OF FEE, SIMPLE OWNERSHIP.

IT IS FEASIBLE ONCE.

THEY'VE GOT A COMMON WALL.

I'M NOT SURE HOW THAT. OR.

I THINK THE OTHER PLACES I HAVE NOT ALWAYS HAD A LOT OF TIME TO SHARE THE.

[00:25:07]

WELL, IT'S INTERESTING.

YES. IT WOULD JUST BE A SHARED COMMON.

AND YOU STILL TRANSFER TITLE FEE? SIMPLE. AND THEY SHOULD HAVE.

IT SHOULDN'T BE COMMON.

AND THEN THE LAST THING THAT WE DID WAS FOR SECTION 56, WHICH IS THE OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS WE JUST ADDED IN ROW HOUSE, WHERE IT'S NOT IN THERE RIGHT NOW TO PROVIDE THEM WITH A PARKING RATIO OF TWO DWELLING UNITS, TWO PARKING SPACES FOR DWELLING UNIT AND THEN REMOVED APARTMENT AND ADDED MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS IS ALREADY IN THERE.

IT'S INCONSISTENT WITH THE NEW PROPOSED LANGUAGE.

ONE QUESTION WE DID HAVE FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WAS WE HAVE NOT ADDED ROWHOUSE AS A POTENTIAL PERMITTED USE IN ANY OTHER DISTRICT.

IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU WANT TO.

YOU'VE GOT TO COME UP AGAIN WITH WHAT WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT AS FAR AS THE NUMBER OF UNITS WE'RE GOING TO WANT TO ALLOW PER ACRE THAT'S GOING TO TELL US WHAT AREA IT NEEDS TO BE IN IN TERMS OF LOW OR MEDIUM HIGHER DENSITY.

IT'S GOING TO BE THE SAME AS TOWNHOUSE.

WELL, I'M NOT SO SURE. RIGHT? I'M NOT SURE. JUST THROW IT OUT THERE.

BUT PROBABLY MAKES MORE SENSE FOR THAT THAN ANYTHING.

WE CAN AMEND THIS WITH YOUR FEEDBACK FROM TODAY AND BRING THAT BACK TO YOU WITH THAT COMPARISON OF THE DENSITIES PER ACRE SO THAT YOU CAN LOOK AT THAT AND EVALUATE IT FURTHER AND PROVIDE FURTHER GUIDANCE.

YEAH. JUST SOMETHING ELSE.

NO, SIR. I BELIEVE THAT'S IT.

FOCUS, NORTH TEXAS, IF YOU WERE SIGNED UP FOR THAT, HAS BEEN POSTPONED.

I'M STILL WAITING ON AN EMAIL FROM THE ORGANIZERS AS TO WHEN THAT WILL BE.

I'VE BEEN TOLD THAT IT MAY BE LATE SPRING, EARLY SUMMER.

AND EVERY TIME I FOLLOW UP, I'VE BEEN TOLD TO PUSH OUT A NOTIFICATION, BUT NOTHING'S COME OUT YET.

SO I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.

THAT BEGAN AT 6:45.

[3. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance: Council Member Sharron Rogers ]

ANY ACTION OF THE COUNCIL AS A RESULT OF THAT SESSION? MR. RUMBLEOW? NO, YOUR HONOR.

I COMPLETES THE EXECUTIVE SESSION.

ARE YOU READY, MR. CHAIRMAN? YES, SIR. ARE YOU READY, SHARRON? YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT, WE'LL CALL THE 7:30 MEETING TO ORDER.

AND AS YOU TO RISE THROUGH ACTION PLEDGE.

SHARON ROGERS, PLEASE BEAR WITH ME.

OUR HEAVENLY FATHER.

WE COME TO YOU TONIGHT, GRATEFUL FOR THE COUNTRY THAT WE LIVE IN FOR THE FREEDOMS THAT WE HAVE.

WE THANK YOU FOR THE ELECTED OFFICIALS AROUND THE DAIS.

WE THANK YOU FOR OUR CITY STAFF, FOR THE LEADERSHIP OF THOSE.

WE THANK YOU FOR ALL OF THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN OUR COMMUNITY, WHO VOLUNTEER AND WHO MAKE IT WORK SO WONDERFULLY.

WE ASK YOUR GUIDANCE AS WE DELIBERATE THE ITEMS ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT, THAT WE MAY DO SO WITH FORETHOUGHT AND GOODWILL AND KINDNESS.

WE ASK YOU TO LEAD US IN OUR LIVES, THAT WE MAY DO THINGS THAT ARE PLEASING TO YOU.

IN JESUS NAME, WE PRAY.

AMEN. AMEN. AMEN.

STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

WELCOME YOU TO OUR MEETING TONIGHT.

WE FIRST HAVE SCHEDULED A JOINT MEETING BETWEEN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE COUNCIL.

WE HAVE TWO CASES THAT HAVE BEEN ADVERTISED.

ONE IS ASKED THAT IT BE WITHDRAWN.

SO WE'LL SEE THE ACTION ON THAT.

WE MAY ONLY HAVE ONE, BUT THE PROCEDURE WILL BE WILL DECLARE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WE'LL GIVE THE APPLICANT AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION, AFTER WHICH ANY GUEST PRESENT THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST.

IF YOU REGISTER WITH THE CITY MANAGER, CITY SECRETARY, YOU'LL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT.

AFTER THE TESTIMONY IS COMPLETE, THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION WILL SEPARATE AND MEET IN A SEPARATE MEETING AND THEIR MEETING ROOM TO THE RIGHT.

[4. Conditional Use Permit CU22-59 (TPA Baseball Training Facility) – City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to an application submitted by Stacy-GV, LLC requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan for CU02-44 (Ordinance No. 2002-80). This request is specifically to allow a baseball training facility inside the existing Stacy Furniture warehouse building. The subject property is located at 1900 South Main Street and is currently zoned “CC”, Community Commercial District. The applicant has requested to withdraw this item. ]

THAT'S A PUBLIC MEETING AND YOU'RE INVITED TO ATTEND THAT, IF YOU LIKE.

THE COUNCIL HAS ITS PUBLISHED AGENDA AND WE'LL REMAIN IN SESSION HERE AND INCLUDED IN THAT WILL CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION TONIGHT. SO WE'LL BEGIN BY OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.

[00:30:06]

CU22-59. THE APPLICANT, I UNDERSTAND, IS REQUESTED OPPORTUNITY TO WITHDRAW.

ERICA MORONEY.

GOOD EVENING, HONORABLE MAYOR.

MAYOR PRO TEM, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

THE APPLICANT, MR. JAMES STACY, HAS REQUESTED THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST FOR TPA BASEBALL BE WITHDRAWN CONSIDERATION FOR THIS EVENING.

STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT BOTH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN CITY COUNCIL ACCEPT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW YOUR RECOMMENDATION.

WE HAVE A MOTION I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE TO APPROVE REQUEST TO WITHDRAW.

SEE YOU. CU22-59.

[5. Conditional Use Permit CU23-01 (Walmart) – City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to an application submitted by Kimley-Horn requesting a conditional use permit to amend the previously approved site plan for CU03-29 for a planned commercial center including an automotive repair facility, gasoline sales, the possession, storage, retail sale of off premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer and wine only) in conjunction with a retail store. This request is specifically to add two metal storage containers for the purpose of storing new parts and landscape equipment for on- and off-site Walmart facility management. The subject property is located at 1601 West State Highway 114 and is currently zoned “CC”, Community Commercial District]

SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS VOTED.

ALLOW THE APPLICANT WITHDRAW A MOTION FROM THE COUNCIL.

I'LL MOVE TO ACCEPT THE WITHDRAWAL.

SECOND, ALL IN FAVOR.

ALL OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES.

THE APPLICATION IS WITHDRAWN.

NEXT, WE'LL DECLARE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO SEE YOU 20 3-1 THE APPLICANT IS WALMART ERICA MORONIC.

THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AMEND THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL CENTER.

THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 26 IRA E WOODS AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 915 FEET WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY 114 AND IS PRESENTLY ZONED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.

THE SITE FEATURES AN EXISTING WAL MART WAL MART SUPERSTORE, WHICH HAS PREVIOUS APPROVALS, INCLUDING AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR FACILITY, GASOLINE SALES IN THE POSSESSION STORAGE, RETAIL SALE OF OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RETAIL STORE.

THIS REQUEST IS SPECIFICALLY TO ADD TWO PERMANENT METAL SHIPPING CONTAINERS EACH EIGHT FEET TALL BY 40 FEET LONG BY EIGHT FEET WIDE, AND SPACE DESIGNATED FOR TWO PICKUP TRUCKS WITH STANDARD LANDSCAPING TRAILERS.

ONE OF THE PROPOSED SHIPPING CONTAINERS WOULD BE DESIGNATED FOR THE STORAGE OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT FOR ON AN OFF SITE WAL MART FACILITY MANAGEMENT, WHILE THE OTHER CONTAINER WOULD BE USED FOR STORE TO STORE PARTS FOR THE ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OF THE WAL MART STORE REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT, THE OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA IS PROPOSED TO BE APPROXIMATELY 40, 4900 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE AND IS ADJACENT TO THE STORE'S SOUTHERN BUILDING ELEVATION NEXT TO THE DALLAS AREA.